Amaryllis Lyle

SR. CONTENT DESIGNER · ENTER PASSWORD TO VIEW

Amaryllis Lyle

Sr. Content Designer

I listen first, write second and build systems that last. After six years designing the words behind cash back and rewards experiences, I know how to connect people to the things they love.

Three brands, end to end Honey PayPal Venmo
Case study 01 · PayPal × Honey

From Honey Gold to PayPal Rewards

PayPal acquired Honey and inherited a rewards program most of its users had never heard of. I decided what it should be called and how it should speak—end to end.

Role
Lead content designer
Partners
Design · product · engineering · brand · legal
Problem

"Honey Gold" meant something to Honey users and nothing to PayPal's hundreds of millions. Every word was up for grabs: the name, the currency, the earn language, the redemption flow and the fine print.

Approach

I drove the decision to retire Honey Gold and introduce PayPal Rewards—new for PayPal users, a refresh for Honey users. From there I set the mechanics language ("cash back," two words, sentence case) and wrote the copy that taught two audiences one program.

Solution

Points-first earning created escheatment risk, and legal wanted lengthy disclaimers everywhere points appeared.

I negotiated the language down to what the law required—setting precedents like never showing a dollar value for unspent points—then documented every naming call so no one had to relitigate them. That framework is still PayPal's source of truth today.

Exhibit · terminology governance, excerpted
TermStatusRule
cash backApprovedTwo words, sentence case—never "cashback"
EarnAlwaysOngoing behavior only—never for one-time bonuses
GetAlwaysOne-time bonuses and incentives—never for ongoing earning
$X value for earned pointsNeverEscheatment risk—no dollar equivalents for unspent points
CongratulationsNeverNot authentic, feels forced—"You earned" instead
Only X points leftNeverLoss framing prohibited—progress is always toward, never away
Impact
+2.2%
Transactions week over week after initial release
2 brands
Unified under one program language
1 system
Terminology governance still in use today
Case study 02 · Venmo

Stash: one name, one system

Venmo's rewards ecosystem grew feature by feature—and its language grew the same way. Different words for the same things, a program name that covered some products and not others, and no one accountable for any of it. I built the taxonomy that made it whole.

Role
Senior content designer
Partners
Marketing · product · design · legal
Problem

Stash launched as a debit-and-balance rewards program, but Venmo's rewards had outgrown it. Credit card cash back and crypto incentives floated outside the name with no labeling or unifying principles. The ad-hoc system meant writers, marketers and PMs were each solving naming locally—and users met a different vocabulary on every surface.

Approach

I ran a structured portfolio analysis with two goals: figure out how Venmo should organize and position everything living under "rewards," and show how the taxonomy changes under different structural architectures. Then I built three models and pressure-tested each.

Exhibit · three architectures, pressure-tested
  • 1 · Status quo. Stash stays debit-specific. Credit and crypto incentives remain unnamed. Fragmentation persists—and Stash stands strangely alone.
  • 2 · Stash as umbrella, organized by ways to pay. Honors the Venmo-as-payments mindset, but treating payment options separately keeps the experience fragmented.
  • 3 · Stash as umbrella, organized by offer type. One centralized rewards hub. Cash Back unites debit, credit, checkout and crypto under a single incentive. Offers and enhancements become scalable, modular extensions. Recommended.
Exploration 1 · status quo — Stash limited to debit, incentives fragmented
Exploration 1 · status quo — Stash limited to debit, incentives fragmented
Exploration 2 · Stash as umbrella, organized by ways to pay
Exploration 2 · Stash as umbrella, organized by ways to pay
Exploration 3 · Stash as umbrella, organized by offer type — recommended
Exploration 3 · Stash as umbrella, organized by offer type — recommended
Solution

Exploration 3 won because it was the only model that unified every reward under one system—and the only one that could absorb new reward types without structural changes. Naming the parts descriptively under one umbrella made the taxonomy coherent and extensible at once.

I made the case that terminology is a product system, not a campaign asset: it has to survive every surface, every legal review and every future feature. Content design won ownership, and with it the ability to keep the taxonomy consistent as the program scales.

Impact
53K
New Stash enrollments—all-time high for the year
+1.7%
Overall spend week over week—another all-time high
+2.8%
Transactions week over week, with redemption volume compounding alongside TPV
Case study 03 · PayPal

Debit categories: test, cut, clarify

PayPal Debit's 5% cash back category picker had a participation problem. Users weren't choosing a category, and those who did weren't engaging with it downstream. This one is a craft story: research-led, tested and iterated until the numbers moved.

Role
Content designer, end to end
Partners
UX research · experience design
Problem

Walking the flow as a user made the problems concrete: category tiles with bare labels and no definition, no demonstration of real-life value, a wall of options in an indigestible format and a CTA that didn't say what would happen next.

Before · the original category selection flow, walked end to end
Before · the original category selection flow, walked end to end
Approach

Listen first. Be the user and flag every pain point. Survey the competitive landscape. Then decide what we can actually test.

I partnered with UX research to run several content tests, and worked closely with experience design to bring merchant logos into the tiles—instant recognition doing the work that copy alone couldn't.

Solution

Four content moves, each one testable: give every category tile a definition users could recognize themselves in ("Groceries—the essentials, in store or delivered"), demonstrate concrete value at the moment of choice, restructure the list into a scannable format and rewrite the CTA to name the action—"Set [Month] category" instead of a generic "Next."

Content design recommendation · defined tiles, merchant logos, value up front, action-naming CTA
Content design recommendation · defined tiles, merchant logos, value up front, action-naming CTA
Impact
1.17M
Total category selections added by the release
40%
Of active cardholders selected a category—a 30% increase
58%
Of enrolled users transacted in their category
368K
Users received a payout—previous high was 351K

The newly added Rideshare & Public Transit category captured 3.4% of selections in its first month and drove the strongest transaction activity of any category for rewarded users.

Current · the shipped flow driving the numbers above
Current · the shipped flow driving the numbers above